Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Cox, R F, Issa, R R A and Koblegard, K (2005) Management’s Perception of Key Behavioral Indicators for Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 368–76.

Gunhan, S and Arditi, D (2005) Factors Affecting International Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 273–82.

Han, S H, Diekmann, J E and Ock, J H (2005) Contractor’s Risk Attitudes in the Selection of International Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 283–92.

Jaselskis, E J, Gao, Z and Walters, R C (2005) Improving Transportation Projects Using Laser Scanning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 377–84.

Kim, K and de la Garza, J M (2005) Critical Path Method with Multiple Calendars. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 330–42.

Lee, D (2005) Probability of Project Completion Using Stochastic Project Scheduling Simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 310–8.

Molenaar, K R (2005) Programmatic Cost Risk Analysis for Highway Megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 343–53.

Moselhi, O, Assem, I and El-Rayes, K (2005) Change Orders Impact on Labor Productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 354–9.

Rojas, E M and Mukherjee, A (2005) General-Purpose Situational Simulation Environment for Construction Education. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 319–29.

Shapira, A and Raz, Y (2005) Comparative Analysis of Shoring Towers for High-Clearance Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 293–301.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Concrete construction; Formwork, construction; Shoring; Towers;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(293)
  • Abstract:
    Formwork for cast-in-place concrete in high-clearance construction is commonly based on multitier shoring towers. The market has responded to the demand for shoring towers by offering numerous proprietary models, from which the constructor can choose. Thus, there is a need for comparative data and selection criteria that are comprehensive, objective, uniformly processed, and systematically organized. This paper presents methodology, formatted data, and findings that purport to assist constructors in rationally selecting the appropriate shoring towers for their projects. For the benefit of industry practitioners, the paper offers an overview of tower configuration and classification, a formatted list of selection criteria generated on the basis of input from formwork manufacturers, and interviews with representatives of formwork service companies, examples of comparative data on selected tower models, and quantitative comparisons based on the introduction of normalized parameters and on formwork solutions for typical cases. This information is particularly vital given the high cost of tower-based formwork relative to the overall construction cost of the supported concrete element, while published erection and dismantling work input data are largely still unavailable for most models and heights of shoring towers.

Son, J, Mattila, K G and Myers, D S (2005) Determination of Haul Distance and Direction in Mass Excavation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 302–9.

Song, L and AbouRizk, S M (2005) Quantifying Engineering Project Scope for Productivity Modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(03), 360–7.